State, ex rel. Turpin v. Court of Common Pleas of Stark County
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant filed his petition under the Post-conviction Remedy Act in September 1965. In spite of appellant’s requests, the court has failed to rule on such petition. The petition has now been pending for some 12 months. As was pointed out in State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Thomas, Judge, 175 Ohio St. 220, although judicial discretion cannot be controlled by mandamus, the writ may issue to compel the exercise of such discretion.
In view of the nature of the Postconviction Remedy Act, the purpose of which is to correct the denial of constitutional rights of an accused, and the prejudice which would…
2Cited by14 opinions
- State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Yee v. Erie County Sheriff's DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Penland v. Dinkelacker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Ferrell v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Bunting v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.