Roberts v. Yellow Cab Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On appeal from the direction of a defendant’s verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, which was premised, except in minor degree, upon plaintiff’s testimony.
A finding of the following facts is justified. Plaintiff, a woman 72 years of age, but gainfully employed, on the early morning of February 10, 1966 telephoned the office of the defendant company, which she had called “ever since 1942,” for trans- portatioii at 6:00 a. m. A taxi cab driven by defendant Fantasia, who had responded to plaintiffs call on several previous occasions, arrived a few minutes after the appointed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Karr v. Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Sanchez v. Pacific Auto StagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Publix Cab Company v. FesslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Chaput v. LussierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Sullivan v. Yellow Cab CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Mastriano v. BlyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2002
- BAKER v. GOODMANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Mastriano v. BlyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.