Legal Opinion
Mastriano v. Blyer
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 14, 2001Published
1Opinion of the Court
779 A.2d 951 (2001)
2001 ME 134
Rachel MASTRIANO
v.
Samuel BLYER et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued June 12, 2001.
Decided September 14, 2001.
Philip P. Mancini (orally), Douglas F. Britton, Drummond & Drummond, LLP, Portland, for plaintiff.
Kevin G. Libby (orally), Elizabeth A. Mooney, Monaghan Leahy, LLP, Portland, for defendants.
Panel: WATHEN, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.
ALEXANDER, J.
[¶ 1] Rachel Mastriano[1] appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Somerset County, Mead, C.J.) on her negligence claims against Samuel…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Champagne v. Mid-Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Corey v. Norman, Hanson & DeTroySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Stanton v. University of Maine SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Searles v. Trustees of St. Joseph's CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.