Chaput v. Lussier
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
These four actions by three different plaintiffs against one defendant are in this court on defendant’s exceptions to the acceptance of referees’ reports, adverse to him. Two of the cases, those by Anna Chaput and Marie Chaput, were once before presented on their exceptions. An issue in the references, concerning which evidence had been introduced, having been left undecided, the exceptions were sustained. Chaput v. Lussier, 131 Me., 145, 159 A., 851. This opened the questions in each case anew. The lower court recommitted the cases to the same referees. This time the referees heard and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Singer v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. HindsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Libby v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
- Garrow v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Mastriano v. BlyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Roberts v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Francoeur v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Gould v. Maine Central Transportation Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.