Legal Opinion
Beidler & Bockmyer Co. v. Universal Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Both parties move for summary judgment. The action is brought to recover $10,000 commissions alleged to be due plaintiff under a policy of insurance issued by defendant on January 17, 1932, to Mac-Lac-Kasabier Chatfield Corporation, now Mac-Lac Company, Inc.
The moving affidavits reveal no dispute of fact. The Mac-Lac Company is engaged in importing shellac from Oriental ports. On December 22, 1931, application was made by plaintiff, as broker, for the issuance of an open ocean cargo policy which was intended to remain in force until can-celled by either party, and under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Degnan v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. of Perth, ScotlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Eagle Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Walsh v. TadlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beidler & Bookmyer Co. v. Universal Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Beidler & Bookmyer, Inc. v. Universal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944