Legal Opinion

Beidler & Bookmyer Co. v. Universal Ins.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

These are cross-motions for summary judgment. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

This is the second lawsuit brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover brokerage commissions alleged to have been earned after August 5, 1941.

In the first action summary judgment was granted in defendant’s favor. D.C., 46 F.Supp. 806, affirmed on March 6, 1943, 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 828.

This court disapproves of the growing tendency to supplement the issues of fact on motions of this character with voluminous controversial affidavits and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beidler & Bookmyer, Inc. v. Universal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Beidler & Bockmyer Co. v. Universal Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API