Legal Opinion

Neary v. Godfrey

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1894No. 15239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and the refusal of plaintiff to amend. The demurrer was upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the facts which were thus claimed to be insufficient to entitle plaintiff to relief were substantially as follows: In 1884, the plaintiff, be*340ing then the wife of one George Godfrey, and owning the premises described in the complaint as her separate property, united with her husband in a declaration of homestead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hutchinson v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Greenlee v. GreenleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Zanone v. SpragueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Morrison v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Howard v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API