Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. McNally
California Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1890No. 12579PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Ejectment. Judgment for defendants upon demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiff appeals. The complaint alleges:—
“1. That one Charles C. Hutchinson, late of the city of Oakland, county of Alameda, state of California, deceased, was at and before his death the owner, and seised in fee and possessed, of that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying, and being in the said city of Oakland, county of Alameda, state of California, described as follows, viz.:— ....
“2. That on or about the second day of June, 1878, the said Charles C. Hutchinson died, having by his last will and testament devised…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Whitehead v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Greenlee v. GreenleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Zanone v. SpragueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hebbard v. ColgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.