Reichhart v. City of New Haven
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge
Upon interlocutory appeal, Penny Reieh-hart1 and Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, Inc. (CWMI) challenge the denial of their motion for summary judgment in the action filed against them by the City of New Haven. The appellants present two issues for review, one of which is dispositive.2 We restate that issue as follows:
Did the trial court err in determining that genuine issues of material fact exist with *29regard to the City’s abuse-of-process claim?
We reverse and remand.
The facts favorable to the City, the non-movant, are that CWMI operates a hazardous waste…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- DISPLAY FIXTURES CO., ETC. v. RL Hatcher, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- North Snow Bay, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Archem, Inc. v. SimoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Tancos v. A.W., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Watson v. Auto Advisors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- International Medical Group, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.