Legal Opinion

Giles v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1933No. 9818PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment in mandamus, on an application of the appellees as mayor and commissioners of the city of Houston, requiring the appellant as controller of the city- — as in compliance with article II, section 19, of the charter of that city — to countersign a contract otherwise duly made between the city and the Municipal Street Sign Company, Inc., for the furnishing and delivering by the latter to the former of 1250 Type 4-X street name plates or signs; all matters of fact as well as of law had been submitted to the court for determination without a jury, and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scanlan v. Gulf Bitulithic Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. City of Denton v. Denton Home Ice Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Houston & Great Northern Railroad v. KuechlerTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Smith Bros., Inc. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taos County Board of Education v. SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Glenn v. Industrial Accident BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Peeples v. NagelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API