Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Nagel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1940No. 11034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The record before this court in this cause is one brought here, in due compliance with R.S. Art. 4662, and reflects an appeal from an order of the 127th District Court of Harris County, refusing the appellants a temporary injunction against the appellees, as well as a sought-for writ of mandamus; such appeal has likewise under that statute been advanced for consideration here; in addition, and somewhat as ancillary to such appeal, the same appellants have likewise by an original application, given motion No. 11842, in this court, sought what they term “writs of temporary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giles v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Universal Transport & Distributing Co. v. CantuCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawyers Surety Corporation v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of Houston v. David B. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  3. Annise D. Parker, Mayor, Anna Russell, City Secretary, and City of Houston v. David B. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1992
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API