Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Alexander and Baldwin, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1975No. 5468-5471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEWIS, J.

Alexander and Baldwin, Inc., through its division A & B Commercial Company, hereinafter referred to as “A & B,” became surety on performance bonds for the construction by Abe Construction, Inc. of homes for appellants, hereinafter referred to as “owners. ” There were four separate contracts. After partial performance of each contract, the contractor, in July, 1969, abandoned the work and ceased doing business. On July 10, 1969, A & B notified the several owners that, as surety, it would complete the work. Litigation ensued, and the four cases were consolidated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance Company and First National Bank in Dallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  3. M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  4. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. McKnight v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Abramson v. Board of Regents, University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Marchesseault v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. T. Ferguson Construction, Inc. v. Sealaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API