Legal Opinion

Abramson v. Board of Regents, University of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1976No. 5729PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*681OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KIDWELL, J.

Plaintiff sought in this action to establish or enforce a claim to academic tenure as a member of the faculty of the University of Hawaii. The trial court determined that tenure had not been acquired but directed the Board of Regents to consider Plaintiff’s case. Upon compliance by the Board, the complaint was dismissed. Costs were awarded to Plaintiff. Both Plaintiff and Defendants appeal. On Plaintiff’s appeal, we affirm. On Defendants’ appeal, we reverse the award of costs to Plaintiff.

We deal in this case with an important aspect of the relationship…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Joseph Victor Cusumano and Sidney M. Harmon, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. Dr. C. Brice Ratchford, Appellees-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Abramson v. University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bush v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API