T. Ferguson Construction, Inc. v. Sealaska Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the superior court after a bench trial. The court determined that Sealaska Corporation was justified in withholding a progress payment due to T. Ferguson Construction Company under two related construction contracts and awarded damages to Sealas-ka. Ferguson appeals. We affirm.
I
The facts of this case are largely undisputed. In late April 1988, T. Ferguson Construction, Inc. (Ferguson) entered into three road construction contracts with Sea-laska Corporation. The contracts involved construction and rehabilitation of logging *1059roads at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elda Arnhold and Byzantio, L.L.C. v. Ocean Atlantic Woodland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Jourdan v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Brotherton v. WarnerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Joyner v. VitaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Arnhold, Elda v. Ocean Atlantic WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.