Legal Opinion

Waters v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 1993No. Agency No. 93-AB-459 CA A79122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB), contending that EAB erred in concluding that he was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct. We have considered all the assignments of error and write only to address claimant’s contention that EAB should have found that his conduct was an isolated instance of poor judgment.

Claimant worked for employer as a free lance “voice talent,” doing voice-over work. He worked under a contract with no specific starting or ending date, and could be dismissed with three weeks’ notice. Before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perez v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Linville v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Double K Kleaning Service, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. MacKillop v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API