City of High Point v. Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabKSON, J.
The appealing defendant, R. G. Hendrix, at the close of plaintiffs evidence and at the close of all the evidence made motions in the High Point Municipal Court, for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The High Point Municipal Court overruled these motions and the court below sustained these rulings and in this we can see no error.
A finding of fact is as follows: “That the defendants, C. E. Diffendale and wife, Lida D. Diffendale, were the owners of the land hereinafter described at the time of the making of the said local improvement on Montlieu Avenue; that subsequent to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Waddill v. . MastenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Bost v. Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- City of Charlotte v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Gallimore v. Town of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- City of High Point v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Moss v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Town of Wake Forest v. GulleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938