Legal Opinion

State v. Rudolph

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 1979No. 7810SC749PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The defendant has brought forward on appeal numerous exceptions and assignments of error. We note initially that defendant has failed to comply strictly with the requirements of Appellate Rule 28(b)(3) by not properly setting forth a reference to the exceptions and assignments of error following each question presented in the argument portion of his brief. Nevertheless, because such references were properly made under the “Issues Presented” portion of the brief, and the appellant has otherwise conformed with the rules of appellate procedure, we will consider the arguments.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API