Legal Opinion
Loverin v. Wedge
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 18, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
This is an action to recover for the alleged conversion of a Cadillac automobile. Triál was by jury, and at the close of all the evidence, the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict. The motion was overruled, and thereupon the defendant moved for a directed verdict. ' This motion was granted to which the plaintiff excepted.
The following appeared in evidence: The plaintiff owned a Dodge automobile which he exchanged with the Flanders Motor Company of Rutland for a Cadillac automobile. He paid $40 in cash and signed a conditional sale agreement and gave a note for $161.60 for the balance. He…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hodgeden v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- Crampton v. Valido Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Armington v. HoustonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
- Norton v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
- Bean v. ColtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lehan v. North Main Street Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Gaylord v. HoarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Collins v. Estate of CollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Eastman v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932