Legal Opinion
Haven v. State Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 15, 1994No. 14729PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The principal issue in this administrative appeal is whether the obligation of a town to appropriate sufficient funds to a local board of education to meet the minimum expenditure requirement (MER) of General Statutes § 10-262j has been met if the appropriation is sufficient to meet the MER alone but not *701sufficient for other educational requirements.1 A hearing board of the defendant state board of education (state board), after an investigation and evidentiary hearing, determined that the plaintiffs, the city of New Haven and its board of finance (city), had failed to appropriate sufficient…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- West Hartford Education Assn., Inc. v. DeCourcySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity Ex Rel. Eikum v. Idaho State Board of Education Ex Rel. MossmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Board of Education v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.