Legal Opinion

Frame v. Indust. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1939No. 3047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above-entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of defendant’s appeal on question of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.

In the trial court a jury was waived and the cause submitted on the pleadings, evidence and argument of counsel. There is very little if any controversy on the factual questions.

On or about July 30, 1934 Mr. Rollo S. Frame, Jr., was an employee of the State of Ohio in the Department of Highways. He had the specific title of engineer in the Bureau of Construction. His particular…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Stockley v. School District No. 1 of Portage Township.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tipple v. High Street Hotel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Duffy v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API