Legal Opinion
Brenner v. Stavinsky
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1939No. 28417PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an appeal from an order and decision of the district court of Tulsa county sustaining a demurrer of the defendants, Oscar Stavinsky and Jake Eilenberg, to the amended petition of the plaintiff, L. M. Brenner, and dismissing plaintiff’s action.
The order of appearance in thisf court is the same as in the trial tribunal and our continued reference to the parties will be by their trial court designation.
The. parties to the action are competitors in the tailoring business in the city of Tulsa. The defendants prior to their entry into the competitive field were employees of the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peerless Pattern Co. v. Pictorial Review Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Fulton Grand Laundry Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Colonial Laundries, Inc. v. HenrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
- Garst v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Morrison v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
3Cited by12 opinions
- Australian Gold, Inc. v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Central Plastics Company v. GoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- MTG Guarnieri Manufacturing, Inc. v. ClouatreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. Herbert WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- National Motor Club of Oklahoma, Inc. v. State Insurance BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.