Legal Opinion
Australian Gold, Inc. v. Hatfield
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2006No. 03-6218PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This case stems from Defendants’ unauthorized resale over the internet of indoor tanning lotions manufactured and distributed by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sued Defendants for trademark infringement, false advertising, and tortious interference with the contracts between Plaintiffs and their distributors. Defendants filed this appeal after a jury awarded Plaintiffs over $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
In this appeal, Defendants assert that the district court erred in denying Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs’ claims. Defendants…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Leroy Alexander v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation James Jeros Steven Brechtelsbauer Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- McPhail v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Image Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Knight v. Mooring Capital Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.