Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1989No. OSB 88-6; SC S34879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a disciplinary complaint against the accused after he was convicted of giving a bribe, ORS 162.015, bribing a witness, ORS 162.265, and tampering with a witness, ORS 162.285. The witness was a police officer whom the accused bribed to “fix” a prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants. The Bar charged the accused under two sections of the Oregon State Bar Act and three subsections of DR 1-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. 1

The accused did not file an answer to the complaint. He appeared at the hearing before the Trial Panel of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re GarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API