Legal Opinion

Needs v. Hebener

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1990No. 17433PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment upon a jury verdict in favor of Larry and Karla Needs for materials and labor furnished in the construction of a log home for Gary and Sue Hebener. The Hebeners raise several issues on appeal. First, they assert that the court erred proeedurally and substantively in giving the jury preliminary and written instructions. Second, that the court erred in allowing the Needs to amend their complaint to include claims based upon account stated and quantum meruit. Third, that the court committed error by admitting a demand letter into evidence.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. BeasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Packard v. Joint School District No. 171Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Powell v. SellersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Vendelin v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Flamingo Realty, Inc. v. Midwest Development, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Grover v. WadsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Parrott Mechanical, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API