Legal Opinion
Roth v. Syracuse Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment granting in part the relief sought in the CPLR article 78 petition, respondent contends, inter alia, that Supreme Court improperly granted the relief on a ground not alleged in the petition and without affording it time to serve an answer. On February 5,1998, respondent suspended petitioners from participation in the Federally subsidized Section 8 program {see, 42 USC § 1437f) on the ground that petitioners were not screening prospective tenants and had committed fraud. A previous suspension related to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Nassau Boces Central Council of Teachers v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rauer v. State University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Briedis v. Village of Tuxedo ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizens Against Retail Sprawl v. GizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Burns v. CarballadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Intermor v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Roth v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Anderson v. 124 Green Street, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.