Legal Opinion
Burns v. Carballada
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul two determinations of the Municipal Code Violations Bureau (Bureau) of respondent City of Rochester (City), which separately found them guilty of a City Code violation set forth in appearance tickets, i.e., owning property that was occupied without a valid Certificate of Occupancy (CO) in violation of City Code § 90-16 (A) (2) (d). That provision provides that a CO must be obtained within a period of 90 days prior to the expiration or termination of an existing CO.
In their petition, petitioners sought annulment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sokolov v. Village of FreeportNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Roth v. Syracuse Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- City of Rochester for a Warrant To Inspect 449 Cedarwood Terrace v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Faison v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cappon v. CarballadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- CAPPON, CHRISTOPHER v. CARBALLADA, CARLOSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cappon v. CarballadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- GUESNO, ROBERT v. VILLAGE OF EAST ROCHESTERAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014