Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Founders' Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1961No. Civ. 24822PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an action by plaintiff, as obligee of a bond, to recover damages from defendant, as surety on the bond, since the principal obligor, Roark, had failed to perform.

Defendant, Founders’ Insurance Company, filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff Mahoney, Roark, and others for damages on the ground of asserted fraud via concealment of certain facts on the part of cross-defendants. After all the evidence had been presented on the question of “concealment” and the court had determined that issue, Founders dismissed the cross-complaint as to all cross-defendants except Roark. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Aronowicz v. Nalley's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API