Mahoney v. Founders' Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
This is an action by plaintiff, as obligee of a bond, to recover damages from defendant, as surety on the bond, since the principal obligor, Roark, had failed to perform.
Defendant, Founders’ Insurance Company, filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff Mahoney, Roark, and others for damages on the ground of asserted fraud via concealment of certain facts on the part of cross-defendants. After all the evidence had been presented on the question of “concealment” and the court had determined that issue, Founders dismissed the cross-complaint as to all cross-defendants except Roark. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Aronowicz v. Nalley's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.