Legal Opinion

White v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 8, 1930No. 19389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFEND ADDER, C.

Defendant in er- . ror, herein referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $490 alleged to be due for work and labor; $100 claimed as the one-sixth interest of the sum of $600 received by defendant on account of a transaction involving an oil and gas lease in which plaintiff claimed a one-sixth interest; $33 being one-sixth of the sale price of an oil tank valued at $200, which defendant is alleged to have sold in which plaintiff claimed a one-sixth interest, and $50 being one- sixth of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. McIver v. KatsiolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. First State Bank of Inola v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Sloan v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Barker v. TrottingwolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Wagnon v. ShoptawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API