Legal Opinion
Haemonetics Corp. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 2, 2010No. 2009-1557PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Baxter Healthcare Corp. and Fenwal Inc. (collectively, “Fenwal”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granting judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) that asserted claim 16 of U.S. Patent 6,705,983 (“the '983 patent”) is not indefinite, from the district court’s denial of JMOL that claim 16 was either anticipated by prior invention or obvious, and from the court’s award of prospective remedies. Because the district court erred in its construction of “centrifugal unit” in claim 16, thereby affecting the court’s other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Volterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Haemonetics Corp. v. Fenwal, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Adrea, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.