Haemonetics Corp. v. Fenwal, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
These two related cases arise from a patent dispute between Haemonetics Corp. (“Haemonetics”) and Fenwal, Inc. (“Fenwal”) concerning a red blood cell (“RBC”) separation device. Pending before the Court are the defendant’s motion for attorney fees, costs and expenses and the plaintiffs motion to disallow certain items in the defendant’s Bill of Costs. Because this dispute stretches back over five years and encompasses two separate cases, some relevant background is included.
I. Factual Background
A. The '05 Case
In December, 2005, Haemonetics, a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Soberay MacHine & Equipment Company, (96-3946 97-3308)/cross-Appellee v. Mrf Limited, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-3997)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Lamboy-Ortiz v. Ortiz-VelezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carnevale v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Caruso v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- ITyX Solutions AG v. Kodak Alaris, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Modeski v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- SiOnyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.