Legal Opinion
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 25, 2008No. 2007-1149PublishedCited by 195 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (“Halliburton”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLC, No. 6:05-CV-155 (E.D.Tex. Nov. 20, 2006) (“Judgment Order”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of MI LLC (“M-I”), holding that independent claims 1-3 and 5 and their asserted dependent claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,887,832 B2 (“the '832 patent”) were invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. We heard oral argument on November 7, 2007. Because a claim term…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by195 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.