Legal Opinion

Salinger v. Superintendent

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 1955No. [No. 115, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

In 1950 the jury found the appellant, Dolfi Salinger, insane at the time of the offenses and at the time of trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, where he was being tried for various crimes of violence, including robbery with a deadly weapon. The court committed him to Spring Grove State Hospital as authorized by Code (1951), Art. 59, Sec. 7. At the trial, three of the four doctors who testified said that Salinger was not able to distinguish right from wrong or to understand the nature and significance of his acts—in other words, that he was insane under the McNaughten rule established as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Spencer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  3. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Wells, by Gillig v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Farrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. State v. BlubaughWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. Barnes v. BehanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API