Legal Opinion
Wells, by Gillig v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1953No. 4515_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The appeal in this proceeding in habeas corpus presents a question respecting which there is a dearth of controlling landmarks. An indictment was returned in the United States Court for Kansas charging Joe Wells, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, with the crime of transporting in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle, knowing it to have been stolen. Petitioner was arrested and subsequently taken before the court. After a hearing, the court found that there was reasonable cause to believe that petitioner was mentally incompetent and that he should be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sporza v. . German Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Chippewa Indians of Minn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Lawrence C. Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Richard L. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Jeffrey I. CohenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene McEachernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.