Cozart v. Hudson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
Tbe only assignment of error requiring discussion is based on tbe disallowance of tbe motion of tbe defendants to dismiss tbe plaintiff’s action upon compulsory nonsuit after all tbe evidence on both sides was in.
“In determining the legal sufficiency of testimony to withstand a motion for a compulsory nonsuit after all the evidence on both sides is in, the testimony is interpreted most favorably to plaintiff, and most strongly against defendant. Thus all facts in evidence, whether introduced by plaintiff or defendant, which make for the plaintiff’s claim or tend to support bis cause of action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Smith v. RawlinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- White v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bell v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.