Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1912No. 10303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered December 19, 1911, confirming an assessment for a local improvement, upon appeal from the city council.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant owns real property situated in the city of Seattle which abuts upon Maynard avenue therein. By Ordinance No. 19,235, the city caused that part of Maynard avenue in front of and in the vicinity of the appellant’s property to be improved at the expense of the property benefited, and caused a part of the cost thereof to be assessed upon appellant’s property as property so benefited. The appellant protested before the city council at the proper time against the assessment, but the protest was overruled by that body and the assessment allowed to stand. The appellant thereupon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Vreeland v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boston & Albany Railroad v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Thorberg v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Trippeer v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rumsey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API