Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1901No. 3933PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

The complaint in this action in-substance alleges that the city of Seattle is a city of the first class; that the city has passed an ordinance providing for the laying of a water main, with the necessary gates, tees, crosses, fire hydrants and other appurtenances for a reasonable water service and fire protection, along a certain street in said city; that the plaintiff is the owner of a lot fronting on said street; that for the purpose of paying for said water main.and its gates, etc., the city has created a local improvement district, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. Union Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Allen v. DrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  3. State ex rel. Stateler v. ReisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Baker v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sawyer v. DooleyNevada Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. VanceWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Union High School District No. 1 v. Taxpayers of Union High School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Globe v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Robb v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API