Legal Opinion

Trippeer v. Couch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The petitioners and appellants complain that the County Court refuses to construct a paved road from Island City to The Cove, in Union County. As a result of such refusal, they caused an alternative writ to issue, commanding defendants to show cause why a permanent road has not been con*454structed between tbe named points and paved “with concrete, asphalt, bitulithic or some similar hard surface pavement. ’ ’

In the case of James et al. v. City of Newberg et al., 101 Or. 616, 622 (201 Pac. 212), we quoted the following definition of “pavement” from 9 Nelson’s Encyclopedia:

“ ‘Pavement’ is a hard…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  2. Ex Parte Jesse HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Miller v. County Court of Tucker CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Dechert v. Commonwealth ex rel. SmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Burton v. . FurmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holloway v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Boston & Albany Railroad v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. School District No. 29 v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Gattman v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cordill v. City of EstacadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API