Legal Opinion

Health & Welfare Plan for Employees of REM, Inc. v. Ridler

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 11, 1996No. Civil 3-96-591PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Presently before, the Court is the motion of Plaintiffs Health and Welfare Plan for Employees of REM, Inc. (hereafter, “The Plan”), and Douglas Miller (hereafter, “The Administrator”) for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Ridler was injured in a motorcycle accident in 1991. As an employee of REM, Inc., he was covered by the medical benefits Plan sponsored by his employer. Since the accident, the Plan has paid over $400,000 for Ridler’s medical expenses. Ri-dler commenced suit in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Custer v. Pan American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Stowers v. MahonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc., James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United McGill Corporation v. Sharon StinnettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
  3. IBP, Inc. v. FoustDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  4. Fairfield Manufacturing Co. v. HartmanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
  5. PRC, Inc. v. O'BryanFairfax County Circuit Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API