IBP, Inc. v. Foust
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZOSS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This dispute concerns whether an employee benefit plan with a “full reimbursement” subrogation provision must contribute to the legal expenses incurred by a plan participant to recover from a third party tort-feasor.
On June 24, 1997, the parties consented to have this matter decided by the undersigned United Státe Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (Docket No. 10). Plaintiff IBP, Inc. filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on August 29, 1997 (Docket No. 12). On…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- PRC, Inc. v. O'BryanFairfax County Circuit Court · 1998
- Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002