Legal Opinion

Janice M. v. Margaret K.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 19, 2008No. 122 September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

We decide in this case whether Maryland recognizes de facto parenthood status and, if so, whether a person who satisfies the requirements of that status is entitled to visitation or custody rights over the objection of a fit, legal parent,1 without having to establish that exceptional circumstances warranting such rights exist. We shall hold that de facto parenthood is not recognized in Maryland. Accordingly, we conclude, in order to overcome the constitutional rights of a legal parent to govern the care, custody, and control of his or her child, even a person who would…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Ross v. Cecil County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Moreau v. Sylvester, Sylvester v. MoreauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Conover v. ConoverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API