Legal Opinion

Smith v. Shelton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1978PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this condemnation case to resolve a conflict of opinion among the members and sections of the Court of Appeals on the question of the proper scope of review to be applied by the Court of Appeals where, after a jury verdict for plaintiff, the trial judge suggests an additur.

What is said herein with respect to the scope of review of additurs applies to remit-titurs, and vice versa. The cases cited herein prior to 1969 involve remittiturs, but insofar as the scope of review is concerned, would dictate the same results when applied to additurs.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Reeves v. CatignaniTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Town of Clinton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  5. Tennessee Coal & Railroad v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Benson v. Tennessee Valley Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ellis v. White Freightliner Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Poole v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Donriel A. Borne v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API