Legal Opinion

Lankford, State Bank Com'r v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1915No. 3990PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, OJdahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. ' Action by Charles ,W. Schroeder against J. D. Lank-ford, State Bank Commissioner. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This cause originated in the district court of Oklahoma county upon the petition of Charles W. Schroeder as plaintiff against J. D. Lankford, as State Bank Commissioner of the state of Oklahoma, in possession of the Planters’ & Mechanics’ Bank, a corporation, under the banking laws of said state. After alleging that the bank was a corporation doing business in. Oklahoma under the state banking laws, plaintiff’s petition stated, in substance, as follows: That the defendant, J. D. Lank-ford, is the duly appointed and acting bank commissioner of the state of Oklahoma and as such was in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lankford v. Platte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. CockrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Columbia Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Farish v. State Banking Bd. of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Lankford v. Oklahoma Engraving & Printing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Banking Board v. PilcherTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Wentz v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Antrim Lumber Co. v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API