Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Oklahoma Engraving & Printing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1913No. 2379PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Brror from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Intervention by the Oklahoma Engraving & Printing Company in action by State Bank Commissioner to wind up affairs of insolvent state bank. Judgment for intervener, and the Commissioner brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the court below, whereby it enjoined the State Bank Commissioner, who was administering the affairs of the insolvent Columbia Bank & Trust Company, from preferring the depositors’ guaranty fund over what is called a “merchandise creditor” in the distribution of the assets of the defunct bank. Counsel for the defendant in error, who was a creditor of the bank by virtue of sales of supplies made prior to its insolvency, state their position in their brief as follows:

“We concede that the depositors’ guaranty fund is a fund for the sole payment of depositors in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbia Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lovett, Creek County Com'rs v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wirtz v. NestosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lankford, State Bank Com'r v. SchroederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Strain v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API