Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 19, 2002No. 2001-087PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential), appeals a Superior Court (Fauver, J.) order declaring that Prudential may not reduce uninsured motorist benefit payments to the plaintiffs, Jane and Patrick Kelly, by the amount recoverable from the uninsured tortfeasor. We affirm.
Plaintiff Jane Kelly was injured in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, she and her husband, Patrick Kelly, carried uninsured motorist insurance issued by Prudential, with a recovery limit of $100,000. The plaintiffs settled with the tortfeasor for the liability limit of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Brouillard v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Deyette v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Exeter Hospital, Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Santos v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- Barbuto v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Joseph A. Santos v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019