Hoover v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
1. Assuming that actionable negligence is alleged by those allegations of the petition asserting that the defendant was violating the speed limit and the defendant maintained buildings obscuring the visibility of persons approaching the crossing and that the engineer failed to exercise due care under the circumstances (including failure to signal the approach of the train) to avoid injury to a vehicle stalled on the track (Southern R. Co. v. Lambert, 106 Ga. App. 691, 695, 128 SE2d 87), the plaintiff is still not entitled to recover if, by the exercise of ordinary care for his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Brown v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Harris v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Lord v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Southern Railway Co. v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chotas v. J. P. Allen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. MitchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Raymond v. Amada Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996