Lord v. Southern Railway Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff himself testified that he saw the train approaching some two or three hundred yards south of the crossing immediately before he drove onto the crossing; that he thought he had time to get across the crossing, and that he would have gotten across, had not his automobile stalled on the crossing; that the ground cable of his automobile caused it to stall; and that it gave him trouble the night before the accident. He testified in part: “I stopped for the crossing and thought I could make it across. I had put it in gear to catch it up and go on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Thomas v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Harris v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Railway Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Hines v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porter v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. MitchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Hoover v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Ivey v. SymmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952