Legal Opinion

Steelstone Industries, Inc. v. McCrum

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 17, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Rodney E. McCrum appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Aroostook, Pierson, J.) affirming the orders of the District Court (Houlton, Grif-fiths, J.) finding that McCrum’s individual retirement account (IRA) is not exempt from collections of a money judgment because he had not established that it was reasonably necessary for the support of himself and his dependents. McCrum asserts that the District Court erred as a matter of law in allocating to him the burden of proof to establish the exempt status of his IRA funds. Because McCrum failed to make a prima facie showing that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re FlygstadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1986
  2. In Re MaylinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
  3. Dargie v. DargieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Kapler v. KaplerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Bissias v. KoulovatosSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Erik Wuori v. Travis OtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Maine Eye Care Associates P.A. v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. Wright & Mills v. BisphamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Adult Guardianship of L.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API