Legal Opinion
In Re Maylin
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Decided June 9, 1993No. 19-20063PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JAMES B. HAINES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Dwight Maylin’s Chapter 13 plan is before the court for confirmation. Sherman, Sandy & Lee, his former counsel in pre-petition divorce proceedings and, presently, a judgment creditor, has objected. The plan and objection raise issues under 11 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 522, 1 under Fed. R.Bankr.P. 3006 and 4003(b) and under the law as articulated by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1644, 118 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992). For the reasons set forth below I conclude that the requisite good faith inheres in Maylin’s…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Adams v. Hartconn Associates, Inc. (In Re Adams)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Premier Capital, Inc. v. DeCarolis (In Re DeCarolis)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2001
- Rushton v. Bank of Utah (In re C.W. Mining Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- In Re ColferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
- In Re FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.