Legal Opinion

Peterson & Simpson v. IHC Health Services, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2009No. 20080507, 20080420PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

[ 1 This case centers on the interpretation of the arbitration clause of a contract entered into by IHC Health Services, Inc. (IHC) and Peterson & Simpson (Peterson). Appellant and Cross-Appellee IHC asks us to determine whether the district court erred in ordering the parties to select arbitrators for their underlying dispute by a procedure formulated by the court. Appellee and Cross-Appellant Peterson asks us to determine whether the district court erred in finding that all of its claims are subject to arbitration.

BACKGROUND

T2 For almost twenty years, IHC…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Encon Utah, LLC v. Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Bybee v. AbdullaUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McNeil Engineering & Land Surveying, LLC v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. South Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Hitorq v. TCC Veterinary ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Iota v. Davco Management CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API