Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 2010No. Nos. A08-1584, A08-1994Published

1Concurrence

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether the common law standard for determining the responsiveness of a bid on a public construction contract applies in the context of the “design-build” contracting process the Legislature' established in Minn.Stat. § 161.3426 (2008). See, e.g., Sutton v. City of St. Paul, 234 Minn. 263, 269, 48 N.W.2d 436, 440 (1951) (“Unless the bid responds to the proposal in all material respects, it is not a bid at all, but a new proposition.” (quoting 10 Eugene McQuillan, The Law of Municipal Corporations § 29.78 (3d ed. rev.1999))). The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API